requestId:68753c2d6eb045.64785379.
Xunzi’s Political Justice Rationalism: The Certification of the State and the Verge of the Monarch
Author: Yu Jinchen (Deputy Professor of the School of Political and Public Governance, Henan Teacher Fan)
Source: “Confucius Research” Issue 5, 2024
Abstract: Xunzi’s Political Justice Rationalism, the content of the State’s Certification of the State and the Right to the Monarch
Confucius Research
Abstract: Xunzi’s Political Justice Rationalism, the content of the State’s Certification of the State and the Right to the Monarch
The concept of “gift” is based on the proof nature rather than the correct nature in Xunzi’s thinking, and uses “gift” as the focus and mediation. On the one hand, Xunzi’s political philosophy solved the needy problems in political countries, which means that the proof of political countries is proved; on the other hand, Xunzi’s assumption of humanity and evil will make people’s tasks complete based on internal conditions such as gifts and monarchs. Since gifts are made by the sage king, the rule of the sage king (monarch) is justified. In discussing national certification issues, the justity of the monarch’s specialized power was highly prominently highlighted by Xunzi.
Keywords: Xunzi RealityBaobao.com Certification Gift
The Eastern community noticed earlier that the difference between authenticity and verifiedity was Hannah Arendt, in the area of division and violence, pointed out that justification is important to complain about the past, and proof refers to a goal in the future. “Power does not need to be proven because it is inherent in the existence of every political community; what power requires is righteousness. . Generally, applying these two words as homophones is like using services from the same situation as supporting the same situation, forming misconduction and confusion. … When nature is challenged, it seeks to be based on past as its own foundation; and it is proved to be connected with a future goal”[1]. After Aronte, John Simmons systematically proposed the justification theory of the rightness of the rightness and the rightness in his essay “Reality and the Verification of Sex”. According to Simmons, the example of the relative division of the rightness and the Verification of Sex is importantly provided by Locke’s political philosophy. According to Locke’s theory, on the one hand, the importance of a country’s justification is to emphasize that only when the ruled is unrestrained, and within the scope of the criteria for the approval, the use of political power is justified [2]; on the other hand, Locke also provides us with evidence of national certification, that is, from the perspective of morality and prudence, a country ruled by an infinite authority has a better life than a natural state because there are many shortcomings in natural states. It is important to note that in Locke, the certification of an unlimited country does not seem to be a valid one. Regarding this problem, Simmons pointed out that Locke has no confession of the certification of an unlimited country, “any country (official) has the right to govern it (any person or all persons within the territory of the territory (i.e., have the right to occupy a position of authority). ”[3] The practice of Locke’s division of proper sex and proof have been extended here in Simmons. According to Simmons’s view, legitimacy belongs to transactional evaluations, namely “the specific relationship between the country and the subject of individuals”, which lays the foundation for the characteristics of moral character in the course of interaction between individuals and their countries (such as giving approval or gaining benefits, and the subsequent states do not have the right to invade the ruled); and proves Preparation price pttSexuality (justification) is based on general sexual evaluation (general) Evaluations, i.e., “the ordinary moral relationship between a state and the subject who is the whole”, is importantly based on the common morality of the state or other extreme attributes (such as their righteousness or justice acceptability) or the morality they realize as the subject who is the whole. A country possesses justification refers to the exclusive moral rights owned by the state, which can issue legally binding orders to impose duties on its subjects, and with a strong wrist or Methods allow the ruled to implement these duties; and the important problem of being certified as a country is related to the statutory non-status. The question answered is why the country is needed rather than the statutory non-status. The important thing to focus on is the country’s own advantages or what the country can provide to us. Benefits. [4] Similar to Simmons, Big Schmitz has also proposed two different national methods of certification, namely “target certification” and “natural certification”. “On ordinary, certification is to confess what it should be or should do. Targeted discussion routes are certified as they are by asking for work done by the system. The natural path of theory is considered to be a natural property of the process of regulating the formation. Targets are certified to set goals and judge actually feasible differences based on how to deal with or how to serve these goals. Innately certify setting some specific type of limitation, i.e. limits on the process that a country produces. Innate proof of the constituents that determine the country’s generation”[5]. For example, if the tree-studdedness of Livitan is not prevented by Hobbes’s war, this is a proof of Livitan’s goal. On the contrary, if we point out that the tree-studdedness of Livitan is derived from the approval of people in natural conditions, this is a proof of natural theory. Schmitz believes that if this is the case with the certification The classification method of a country does not have any logical space, but most or even all major historical certifications of countries Chengdu can be usefully divided into natural proofs or target proofs.
Therefore, based on the common views of contemporary political philosophy, moral rating countries may be justify The state) The topics of the two differences: First, eliminateThe extreme protection means that life is more difficult than life under national governance, so I will not miss you. “If the situation is better, it means that it is a natural problem; the second is to prove how the authority of a country can be consistent with the individual’s autonomy, that is, a legitimate problem. [6] Although we can divide justification and proof in the conceptual level, there are broad theoretical phenomena in the history of Chinese and Western political philosophy that replace and explain justification in the history of Chinese and Western political philosophy. We understand that the profound advancement of any discussion topic is not open to new concept analysis of things and methods. Regarding the concept of political justice in traditional Chinese political philosophy, the academic community has discussed it, and righteousness and proofreadingPurchasing network pptThe conceptual framework of related areas can provide us with a new analysis of political justice problems in traditional Chinese political thinking. In the form of theory, the author tried to use this form of theory to explore the two problems that Xunzi had in his political philosophy, namely the national proof and the legitimacy of monarchy, and led the discussion of fans by dividing the two into two CP (character matching) on the logical level. The relationship between the people was explored in order to highlight the theoretical characteristics of the correct sexual concept of the “inner sage and outside king” in the pre-Qin Confucianism in typology.
1. The unity of righteousness and verified nature: the theory of destiny and virtue
The academic community generally believes that the origin of the problem of correctness in modern Chinese politics can be traced back to the change of dynastic political power in the Yin and Zhou dynasties. After King Wu of Zhou attacked Shang, he once issued a tribute to the old ministers and people of the Shang Dynasty. This pointed out that the Shang Dynasty’s previous kings “protected the Shang people and used the three virtues, suspected that the Shang people were not obsessed with it, and used the vain and used the vain and void”, and when King Wen of Yin, he “replaced the vain and formed the vain and vain”, so “God ordered my little country to say, ‘Revolution of Shang, and I will make you a bright decision’.” (Volume 5 of “Yi Zhou Book”) In the face of the transformation of the dynasty from the Shang Dynasty to the Western Zhou Dynasty, the Zhou people established a set of correct statements of nature. The middle of this statement is related to the concept of destiny” [7]. Zhou Gong and others realized the inconstant nature of destiny from the Xia and Shang dynasties, and gradually formed a set of correct nature statements focusing on “destiny” (“Shang Shu·Kang Yu”), “Heaven is difficult to compete with, and destiny is not constant” (“Shang Shu·Xian You Yi De”) and other statements that the destiny of destiny is not static. The inconstant nature of destiny caused Zhou Gong and others to form a strong sense of worry, In the traditional con TC:
發佈留言